From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Cardenas v. B.O.E. of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 2002
298 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-10437

Argued September 19, 2002.

October 7, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District, dated May 14, 2001, which confirmed the findings of a hearing officer that the petitioner had engaged in misconduct, and terminated the petitioner's employment.

James M. Rose, White Plains, N.Y., for petitioner.

Donoghue, Thomas, Auslander Drohan, Hopewell Junction, N.Y. (Linda A. Geraci of counsel), for respondents.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION JUDGMENT

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The findings of the hearing officer were supported by substantial evidence. Moreover, the punishment was not so disproportionate to the misconduct as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Cardenas v. B.O.E. of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 2002
298 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In re Cardenas v. B.O.E. of Yonkers

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JAIME CARDENAS, petitioner, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 396

Citing Cases

In re Overton

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the…

Solano v. City of Mount Vernon

The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the City's denial of benefits.…