From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Caratzola

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 26, 2020
241 N.J. 490 (N.J. 2020)

Opinion

D-43 September Term 2019 083709

03-26-2020

In the MATTER OF Francis J. CARATZOLA, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 208102017)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 19-135, concluding that Francis J. Caratzola of Springfield, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2017, should be censured for violating RPC 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that respondent should be required to submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics, on a quarterly basis, reports documenting drug screens and treatment program participation for a period of two years;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Francis J. Caratzola is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics, on a quarterly basis, reports documenting drug screens and in treatment programs participation approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Caratzola

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 26, 2020
241 N.J. 490 (N.J. 2020)
Case details for

In re Caratzola

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Francis J. CARATZOLA, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Mar 26, 2020

Citations

241 N.J. 490 (N.J. 2020)
229 A.3d 532

Citing Cases

In re Smith

See, e.g., In re Ten Broeck, 242 N.J. 152 (2020) (censure, with conditions, for attorney's unlawful…

In re Kassem

See, e.g., In re Ten Broeck, 242 N.J. 152 (2020) (attorney unlawfully possessed and used cocaine; the…