From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Calomeni

Supreme Court of Georgia.
Sep 23, 2013
293 Ga. 673 (Ga. 2013)

Opinion

No. S13Y1600.

2013-09-23

In the Matter of Dale E. CALOMENI.

David S. Lipscomb, Spencer Law, LLC, Lawrenceville, for appellant. A. M. Christina Petrig, Paula J. Frederick, Gen. Counsel, State Bar of Georgia, for appellee.


David S. Lipscomb, Spencer Law, LLC, Lawrenceville, for appellant. A. M. Christina Petrig, Paula J. Frederick, Gen. Counsel, State Bar of Georgia, for appellee.
Anthony B. Askew, Chair, Review Panel, for other party.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the second petition of Dale E. Calomeni (State Bar No. 105311) for voluntary discipline for conduct involving three clients.

The Court previously rejected his first petition addressing the same conduct, which violated Rules 1.2, 1.15(I), and 5.3(d) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4–102(d). See In the Matter of Calomeni, 293 Ga. 76, 743 S.E.2d 424 (2013). We rejected the first petition because the sanction sought—a Review Panel reprimand—was not appropriate “inasmuch as the violations concern the mishandling of funds held in trust for a client, exposing clients to improper contact with disbarred lawyers, and pressing forward with lawsuits in the courts contrary to the direction of the client,” and noted that “at the least, they warrant a sanction rendered in plain sight of the community in which Calomeni practices law.” Id. at 77, 743 S.E.2d 424.

Calomeni has filed an identical petition, including pointing out in mitigation that he has no previous disciplinary record, that he has reimbursed his clients in full, and that he has terminated the disbarred lawyer. He now agrees to accept sanctions ranging from the imposition of a public reprimand to a suspension up to six months. The State Bar has no objection to the petition.

Having considered the petition, we agree that the imposition of a six-month suspension is the appropriate sanction in this matter, considering that the purposes of lawyer discipline are to protect the public from attorney misconduct and to promote public confidence in the legal profession. See, e.g., In the Matter of Skandalakis, 279 Ga. 865, 866, 621 S.E.2d 750 (2005). Therefore, we accept Calomeni's petition for voluntary discipline and order that he be suspended from the practice of law in this State for six months, effective as of the date of this opinion. Calomeni is reminded of his duties pursuant to Bar Rule 4–219(c).

Petition for voluntary discipline accepted. Six-month suspension.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

In re Calomeni

Supreme Court of Georgia.
Sep 23, 2013
293 Ga. 673 (Ga. 2013)
Case details for

In re Calomeni

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Dale E. CALOMENI.

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia.

Date published: Sep 23, 2013

Citations

293 Ga. 673 (Ga. 2013)
748 S.E.2d 926

Citing Cases

In re Sosnik

The State Bar has filed a response recommending that the Court accept the petition and notes that previous…

In re Kirby

See, e.g., In the Matter of Johnson , 303 Ga. 795, 799-800, 815 S.E.2d 55 (2018) (six-month suspension for…