From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Byram

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 9, 2012
NO. 03-12-00704-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 03-12-00704-CV

11-09-2012

In re John D. Byram


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BLANCO COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator filed a motion for emergency relief and petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court's discovery order. On October 26, 2012, we granted relator's motion for emergency relief, staying the order until we could receive a response from the real party in interest and consider the merits of relator's petition. Having reviewed the order, relator's petition, the real party in interest's response, and the record, we dissolve our temporary stay and deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. The deadline for relator to comply with the trial court's discovery order is hereby extended to November 16, 2012, or to a new deadline set by the trial court.

____________

David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Goodwin


Summaries of

In re Byram

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 9, 2012
NO. 03-12-00704-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2012)
Case details for

In re Byram

Case Details

Full title:In re John D. Byram

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

NO. 03-12-00704-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 9, 2012)