From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brown

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 17, 2013
216 N.J. 341 (N.J. 2013)

Opinion

2013-12-17

In the Matter of Michael Joseph BROWN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 048791990).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13–107, concluding that MICHAEL JOSEPH BROWN of HADDONFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC, 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 1.16(d) (failure to protect a client's interests on termination of the representation), and RPC 5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL JOSEPH BROWN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Brown

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Dec 17, 2013
216 N.J. 341 (N.J. 2013)
Case details for

In re Brown

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael Joseph BROWN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Dec 17, 2013

Citations

216 N.J. 341 (N.J. 2013)
80 A.3d 731

Citing Cases

State v. Lara

Additionally, when a defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based on a failure to…

In re Hunziker

(admonition; although not admitted in New York, attorney represented a client there; attorney had represented…