From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Burke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 18, 2010
71 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 507463.

March 18, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (O'Connor, J.), entered June 8, 2009 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.

Dennis Burke, Marcy, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced the instant proceeding by order to show cause challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The order to show cause provided that the order, petition, exhibits and supporting affidavits were to be served by ordinary first-class mail upon respondent and the Attorney General on or before December 26, 2008. Petitioner served the papers upon the Attorney General, but not upon respondent. Respondent, in turn, moved to dismiss the proceeding for lack of personal jurisdiction. Supreme Court granted the motion and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. Petitioner's undisputed failure to comply with the service directives of the order to show cause required that the proceeding be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction as he has not demonstrated that his imprisonment presented an obstacle to compliance ( see Matter of Barclay v State of New York Dept. of Correctional Servs., 22 AD3d 974, 974-975; Matter of Robinson v Goord, 21 AD3d 1150, 1151). Although petitioner maintains that CPLR 306-b affords him an extension of time to serve respondent, it is inapplicable where, as here, petitioner brought on the CPLR article 78 proceeding by order to show cause and failed to comply with its service requirements ( see Matter of Frederick v Goord, 20 AD3d 652, lv denied 5 NY3d 712). Accordingly, Supreme Court properly granted respondent's motion and dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Burke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 18, 2010
71 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Burke

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DENNIS BURKE, Appellant, v. NORMAN R. BEZIO, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2010

Citations

71 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 2046
895 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

Watkins v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

Considering these facts, in conjunction with an affidavit from an employee of respondent stating that a…

State v. Robert C.

The language of that statute, however, only permits such an extension if service is not made within the time…