From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Burgos

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 12, 2018
2017-1714 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2018)

Opinion

2017-1714

02-12-2018

IN RE: RAFAEL BURGOS, JUAN HANCKE, EVELYN JARA, MARIA HIDALGO, Appellants

J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants. AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/076,117.

JUDGMENT

J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants. AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 12, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Burgos

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 12, 2018
2017-1714 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2018)
Case details for

In re Burgos

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: RAFAEL BURGOS, JUAN HANCKE, EVELYN JARA, MARIA HIDALGO, Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 2018

Citations

2017-1714 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2018)