Summary
denying petitions for writs of mandamus and of prohibition because relators, in complaining that the probate judge erred by approving an application for authority to sell real property, failed to show that the judge clearly abused his discretion
Summary of this case from Okumu v. Wells Fargo BankOpinion
No. 05-06-00517-CV
Opinion issued April 18, 2006.
Original Proceeding from Probate Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 05-770-P3.
Writ of Mandamus Denied.
Before Justices MORRIS, RICHTER, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators contend the probate judge erred in approving an application for authority to sell real property. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have failed to show the probate judge clearly abused his discretion. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-44 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus. Also, based on the record presented, we DENY relators' petition for writ of prohibition. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a).