From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Burch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Feb 5, 2021
Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-01040-P-BP (N.D. Tex. Feb. 5, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-01040-P-BP

02-05-2021

In re: WILLIAM PAUL BURCH, Plaintiff.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. ECF No. 12. Five days later, Plaintiff William Paul Burch filed a Response to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 13. Burch's Response merely rehashes the same arguments that the Magistrate Judge already considered. First, the Magistrate Judge correctly noted that the waiver-of-fee provision in 28 U.S.C. § 1930(f)(1) is inapplicable. ECF No. 12 at 3. Second, Burch's attachments show that his creditor's efforts to collect continue, which is the same finding made by the Magistrate Judge. Id. at 3. Finally, Burch argues that his other pending litigation somehow supports his in forma pauperis status, but the Magistrate Judge considered Burch's other litigation. Id. at 4. Having considered these arguments, the Court finds that they are frivolous and need not be considered in any further detail. See Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 n. 8 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (en banc) ("Frivolous, conclusive or general objections need not be considered by the district court."). Therefore, Burch's objections are OVERRULED.

The District Judge also reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed for In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 5) is DENIED. Therefore, Plaintiff William Paul Burch is ORDERED to pay the required $400 filing fee to the Clerk of Court within fourteen days of this Order. Plaintiff's failure to pay the required fee will result in DISMISALL without prejudice. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

SO ORDERED on this 5th day of February, 2021.

/s/_________

Mark T. Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Burch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Feb 5, 2021
Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-01040-P-BP (N.D. Tex. Feb. 5, 2021)
Case details for

In re Burch

Case Details

Full title:In re: WILLIAM PAUL BURCH, Plaintiff.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Feb 5, 2021

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:20-cv-01040-P-BP (N.D. Tex. Feb. 5, 2021)