In re Budzyn

3 Citing cases

  1. Warnke v. Nabors

    358 S.W.3d 338 (Tex. App. 2011)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that TWCA barred employee's negligence claim against coworker

    We are not bound by Blazik or Harris. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.7 (stating opinions published before January 1, 2003 and designated “do not publish” are not binding precedent); In re Budzyn, 206 S.W.3d 721, 723 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (stating opinion by one Texas appellate court is not binding on other Texas appellate courts). We are persuaded, however, that the rationale of Aranda and Massey applies not only to a claim against an insurance carrier, but also to a claim against the employer for misrepresentations concerning insurance coverage.

  2. Warnke v. Nabors

    No. 01-09-00734-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2011)

    See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.7 (stating opinions published before January 1, 2003 and designated "do not publish" are not binding precedent); see also In re Budzyn, 206 S.W.3d 721, 723 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.) (stating opinion by a Texas appellate court is not binding on other Texas appellate courts). We are persuaded, however, that the rationale of Aranda and Massey applies not only to a claim against an insurance carrier, but also to a claim against the employer for misrepresentations concerning insurance coverage.

  3. Budzyn v. Citibank

    No. 01-08-00211-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 25, 2010)   Cited 1 times

    This Court denied Budzyn's petition for writ of mandamus. In re Budzyn, 206 S.W.3d 721 (Tex. App.-Houston 2006, orig. proceeding). After a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment in Citibank's favor and awarded it $7,351,57 on amounts due on account 5153 and $13,626.95 for amounts due on account 3226.