From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Buck, Kiaer Co. v. Hartmann Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 5, 1926
243 N.Y. 591 (N.Y. 1926)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1926

Decided October 5, 1926

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

James W. Mack and J. Schnebel for appellant.

Joseph Lorenz and Junius M. Horner for respondent.


Order of Appellate Division modified by striking out that portion thereof appointing Alexander Rose arbitrator to hear and determine the matters and things set forth under the letters "A," "B," "C" and "D" in the notice of motion herein and by striking out the reference made in said items "A," "B" and "C" to samples submitted by Wm. Hartmann Co., Inc., prior to the making of the contract referred to in the petition, and by providing that the arbitrators appointed by the parties proceed to determine the matters and things set forth under letters "A," "B," "C" and "D" in the said notice of motion as so modified, appointing an umpire before proceeding with the hearing, and as so modified affirmed, without costs to either party; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Buck, Kiaer Co. v. Hartmann Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 5, 1926
243 N.Y. 591 (N.Y. 1926)
Case details for

In re Buck, Kiaer Co. v. Hartmann Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of BUCK, KIAER CO., INC., Respondent, for…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 5, 1926

Citations

243 N.Y. 591 (N.Y. 1926)