From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brown

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Mar 6, 2003
No. 09-02-386 CV (Tex. App. Mar. 6, 2003)

Opinion

No. 09-02-386 CV.

Submitted on January 28, 2003.

Opinion Delivered March 6, 2003.

Original Proceeding.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., BURGESS and GAULTNEY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


John Waymon Brown, Russell Vance Buras, Larry Robert Hammond, and Michael Kirk Ross, relators, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court. Tex.R.App.P. 52. Relators contemporaneously filed a notice of interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings. See Brown v. Anderson, No. 09-02-359 CV (Tex.App.-Beaumont March 6, 2003); Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 171.098(a) (Vernon Supp. 2003). The parties do not contest that the Texas Arbitration Act applies in this case; we concur with that position. We have issued an opinion reversing the trial court's order denying the motion to compel arbitration and have remanded the interlocutory appeal to the trial court for further proceedings. See Brown, No. 09-02-359 CV.

As the Texas Arbitration Act, rather than the Federal Arbitration Act, applies, the appropriate remedy is through interlocutory appeal. As relators have successfully prosecuted their interlocutory appeal, their petition for writ of mandamus, involving identical issues and facts, is now moot. The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Brown

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Mar 6, 2003
No. 09-02-386 CV (Tex. App. Mar. 6, 2003)
Case details for

In re Brown

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JOHN WAYMON BROWN, RUSSELL VANCE BURAS, LARRY ROBERT HAMMOND, AND…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Mar 6, 2003

Citations

No. 09-02-386 CV (Tex. App. Mar. 6, 2003)