In re Brown

3 Citing cases

  1. Salkin v. Palm Beach International, Inc. (In re Maxko Petroleum, LLC)

    425 B.R. 852 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2010)   Cited 5 times
    Refusing to allow defendants to collaterally attack a final sale order and the finality of the auction sale approved by that order because "it was only in response to litigation commenced by [plaintiff] months after the fact that [defendants] formally raised this issue"

    As these proceedings arise from orders providing for the disposition of estate property and the Bid Procedure Order and Final Sale Order specifically provide that I retains jurisdiction to enforce and construe the orders and purchase contracts, I find that I have authority to enter final judgments in each adversary proceeding. See Baldridge v. Smith (In re Brown), 67 B.R. 635, 637-38 (Bankr. E.D.Ark.1986) (action against delinquent purchaser at bankruptcy sale is a "core" proceeding). II. PLAINTIFF SALKIN HAS ESTABLISHED A PRIMA FACIE CASE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT

  2. In re Maxco Petroleum, LLC

    Case No. 08-14652-BKC-JKO (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2010)

    As these proceedings arise from orders providing for the disposition of estate property and the Bid Procedure Order and Final Sale Order specifically provide that I retains jurisdiction to enforce and construe the orders and purchase contracts, I find that I have authority to enter final judgments in each adversary proceeding. See Baldridge v. Smith (In re Brown), 67 B.R. 635, 637-38 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1986) (action against delinquent purchaser at bankruptcy sale is a "core" proceeding). II. PLAINTIFF SALKIN HAS ESTABLISHED A PRIMA FACIE CASE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT

  3. In re Maxco Petroleum, LLC

    Case No. 08-14652-BKC-JKO, Adv. No. 08-01833-JKO, Adv. No. 08-01862-JKO (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2010)

    As these proceedings arise from orders providing for the disposition of estate property and the Bid Procedure Order and Final Sale Order specifically provide that I retains jurisdiction to enforce and construe the orders and purchase contracts, I find that I have authority to enter final judgments in each adversary proceeding. See Baldridge v. Smith (In re Brown), 67 B.R. 635, 637-38 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1986) (action against delinquent purchaser at bankruptcy sale is a "core" proceeding). II. PLAINTIFF SALKIN HAS ESTABLISHED A PRIMA FACIE CASE FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT