From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brooks v. Section of N.Y.S. Public

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 2002
300 A.D.2d 1094 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

CA 02-01255

December 30, 2002.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Fisher, J.), entered October 11, 2001, which granted the CPLR article 78 petition.

LAMB LAW OFFICES, ROCHESTER (MAUREEN P. LAMB OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT SECTION v. OF NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC.

McGIVERN, SHAW O'CONNOR, SCOTIA (RONALD SHAW OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC.

WOLFORD LECLAIR LLP, ROCHESTER (PAUL L. LECLAIR OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.

HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (RENEE L. JAMES OF COUNSEL), FOR SECTION III OF NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC., AMICUS CURIAE.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, HAYES, SCUDDER, AND LAWTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum:

Rule 29 of the New York State Public High School Athletic Association, Inc. (NYSPHSAA) provides that a student who transfers from one high school to another "without a corresponding change in residence of his * * * parents * * * is ineligible to participate in any interscholastic athletic contest in a particular sport for a period of one (1) year if the student participated in that sport during the one (1) year period immediately preceding his * * * transfer," with limited exceptions. Section V of NYSPHSAA and NYSPHSAA appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court that, inter alia, determined that Rule 29 is invalid. The court also determined that two students, petitioner Justin Allen and the son of petitioner Terrence J. Brooks, are eligible for football competition in the fall 2001 season.

We hold initially that, although the school year during which petitioners played football at the high school has passed, this appeal is not moot because the issue raised has "public importance, relates to a concern of public interest, and is likely to recur" ( Matter of Gerard v. Section III of New York State Pub. High School Athletic Assn., 210 A.D.2d 938, 939).

Turning to the merits of the appeal, we reject the court's determination that Rule 29 is invalid. The Rule was properly promulgated by NYSPHSAA pursuant to its Constitution and by authority delegated to it through the regulations of the Commissioner of Education, as an "additional rule" consistent with the basic code for "extra class" athletic activities as may be adopted by boards of education relating to items not covered specifically in the code ( 8 NYCRR 135.4 [c] [7] [i] [a]; see generally Section VI of N.Y. State Pub. High School Athletic Assn., v. New York State Pub. High School Athletic Assn. 134 A.D.2d 819). We note that, in the final decision issued by NYSPHSAA's Appeal Panel, the Panel applied a version of the rule permitting waivers of ineligibility for interscholastic sports competition due to transfers on a showing of "undue hardship." We therefore do not reach the issue raised in the court below that Section V's revised version of Rule 29, which omits the possibility of a hardship waiver, is arbitrary or capricious.


Summaries of

In re Brooks v. Section of N.Y.S. Public

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 2002
300 A.D.2d 1094 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In re Brooks v. Section of N.Y.S. Public

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF TERRENCE J. BROOKS, AS PARENT AND GUARDIAN OF LORNE D. BROOKS, A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 1094 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
752 N.Y.S.2d 468

Citing Cases

The Albany Academies v. N.Y. State Pub. High Sch. Athletic Ass'n

The test is whether there is a rational basis for the respondent's actions. Actions are not arbitrary and…

Albany Acads. v. N.Y.S. Pub. High Sch. Athletic Ass'n

The test is whether there is a rational basis for the respondent's actions. Actions are not arbitrary and…