Opinion
21-1990
10-06-2021
In re: THOMAS BROCK, Petitioner.
Thomas Brock, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: September 28, 2021.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:05-cr-00116-D-2).
Thomas Brock, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Brock petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court has granted in part and denied in part Brock's motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Brock's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED