From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brian Tuitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 26, 2011
84 A.D.3d 1658 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 510796.

May 26, 2011.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spain, J.P., Rose, Kavanagh, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination rendered after a tier II disciplinary hearing. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Consequently, inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Murphy v Boucaud, 78 AD3d 1417; Matter of Avincola v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1672, lv denied 15 NY3d 711).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Brian Tuitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 26, 2011
84 A.D.3d 1658 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Brian Tuitt

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BRIAN TUITT, Petitioner, v. THOMAS LA-VALLEY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 1658 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4331
923 N.Y.S.2d 373

Citing Cases

In re DeFilippo v. Connell

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…