From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Brent

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 6, 2019
237 N.J. 90 (N.J. 2019)

Opinion

M-677 September Term 2018 082496

03-06-2019

In the MATTER OF Adam Luke BRENT, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 007612002)


ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed with the Court a petition pursuant to Rule 1:20-3(g) (4) and Rule 1:20-11, seeking the immediate temporary suspension from practice of Adam Luke Brent of Vineland, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2003, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Adam Luke Brent is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Adam Luke Brent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by Adam Luke Brent pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Adam Luke Brent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of the respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State.


Summaries of

In re Brent

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 6, 2019
237 N.J. 90 (N.J. 2019)
Case details for

In re Brent

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Adam Luke BRENT, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Mar 6, 2019

Citations

237 N.J. 90 (N.J. 2019)
202 A.3d 1272

Citing Cases

In re Brent

On March 6, 2019, the Court temporarily suspended respondent for his failure to cooperate with disciplinary…

In re Brent

On March 6, 2019, the Court temporarily suspended respondent for failure to cooperate with disciplinary…