From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Breaches Consolidated Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Feb 13, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 05-4182 (E.D. La. Feb. 13, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 05-4182.

February 13, 2007


THIS PLEADING APPLIES ONLY TO THE CLAIMS OF BRENDA BOWMAN AND CHRISTINE WILLIAMS

SECTION "K" MAGISTRATE (2) ORDER


Considering the Unopposed Motion and Incorporated Memorandum in Support of Motion for Limited Reopening of Case and partial Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion be and is GRANTED, and that the claims of Plaintiffs, Brenda Bowman and Christine Williams, against Defendant, Scottsdale Insurance Company and Scottsdale Indemnity Company, regarding homeowners' insurance policy for 1400 Delery St., New Orleans, La 70117 and 337/39 N. Tonti, New Orleans, La 70119, in the above-captioned matter only, be dismissed with prejudice, specifically reserving all rights against all other parties in any other litigation, each party to bear their own costs.


Summaries of

In re Breaches Consolidated Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Feb 13, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 05-4182 (E.D. La. Feb. 13, 2007)
Case details for

In re Breaches Consolidated Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: Feb 13, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 05-4182 (E.D. La. Feb. 13, 2007)

Citing Cases

Wimbush v. Perez

"Finally, a Rule 59(e) motion should not be used to relitigate prior matters that should have been urged…

Voisin v. Tetra Technologies, Inc.

Generally, there are four grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion can be granted: (1) to correct manifest…