From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Braverman

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 30, 2014
220 N.J. 25 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-30

In the Matter of Fred R. BRAVERMAN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 013841980).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14–030, concluding that FRED R. BRAVERMAN of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter), RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FRED R. BRAVERMAN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Braverman

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 30, 2014
220 N.J. 25 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

In re Braverman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Fred R. BRAVERMAN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Oct 30, 2014

Citations

220 N.J. 25 (N.J. 2014)
100 A.3d 539

Citing Cases

In re Williams

In a matter with several comparable RPC violations, an attorney received a reprimand. In In re Braverman, 220…

In re Watson

when the client filed a grievance; the attorney never informed his client that a motion to compel had been…