From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Branigan v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 9, 2000
269 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 9, 2000

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about July 19, 1999, which denied petitioner's application to annul respondents' determination terminating petitioner's employment as a probationary police officer, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Peter D. Coddington, for Petitioner-Appellant.

John Hogrogian, for Respondents-Respondents.

NARDELLI, J.P., RUBIN, ANDRIAS, BUCKLEY, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


For the reasons stated in Matter of Williams v. Safir ( 265 A.D.2d 182, 696 N.Y.S.2d 139), we reject petitioner's argument that because of Unconsolidated Laws § 891 he could not be terminated without a hearing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Branigan v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 9, 2000
269 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In re Branigan v. Safir

Case Details

Full title:In Re Application of POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL BRANIGAN, etc.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 9, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 900