Opinion
NO. 5-10-0217 NO. 5-11-0223 (consolidated)
05-08-2013
In re MARRIAGE OF CHRISTINE BRADLEY, Petitioner-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, and TIMOTHY BRADLEY, Respondent-Appellant and Cross-Appellee.
NOTICE
Order filed September 11, 2012. Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing May 7, 2013.
NOTICE
This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
Appeal from the
Circuit Court of
St. Clair County.
Nos. 09-D-285 & 09-CH-1255
Honorable
Heinz M. Rudolf,
Judge, presiding.
JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH delivered the judgment of the court.
Justices Welch and Stewart concurred in the judgment.
ORDER
¶ 1 Held: Circuit court did not abuse its discretion in valuation of medical practice, valuation and distribution of retirement accounts, awarding maintenance and attorney fees, disposition of party's firearms, ordering disclosure of party's corporate and tax returns, designation of trustee, and declining to enforce prior temporary support orders and reopen proofs. Circuit court was obligated to make deduction of net income regarding child support and enforce notice of withholding to medical corporation. Mathematical error in valuation of nonmarital asset did not materially alter the circuit court's disposition of assets and, accordingly, did not constitute prejudicial error. ¶ 2 Timothy Bradley, respondent in the above-styled dissolution action, appealed the judgment of dissolution entered by the circuit court of St. Clair County resolving numerous and complicated financial issues between himself and petitioner, Christine Bradley. Christine Bradley cross-appealed on various issues. This action has been acrimonious, complicated, and heatedly contested in virtually all aspects. For the reasons stated below,