From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bos. Sci. Corp. Pelvic Repair Sys. Prods. Liab. Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 22, 2020
MDL NO. 2326 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 22, 2020)

Opinion

MDL NO. 2326

09-22-2020

IN RE: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP., PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO CASES IDENTIFIED ON EXHIBIT A


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On August 13, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiffs on Exhibit A to show cause in their individual cases on or before September 14, 2020, why their individual cases should not be dismissed as to the remaining defendants, including C.R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories, Limited, Sofradim Production SAS, Boston Scientific Corporation, Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, Mentor Corporation, Mentor Worldwide, LLC, Caldera Medical, Inc., Tyco Healthcare Group LP, United States Surgical Corporation, Covidien, Inc., and/or John Does 1-20, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. The Order was sent to the plaintiffs on Exhibit A at their last known address and posted on the court's website.

Plaintiffs have failed to respond to the Show Cause Order. Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 41.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure and after weighing the factors identified in Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989), the court finds that the plaintiffs on Exhibit A have failed to prosecute their cases. The court ORDERS that the above defendants, where named and as identified in the cases on Exhibit A, are dismissed without prejudice. There are no remaining defendants in these cases on Exhibit A and therefor, the court further ORDERS that the cases on Exhibit A are DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the court's active docket. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and each plaintiff on Exhibit A at her last known address.

ENTER: September 22, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Exhibit A


Case Name

Case Number

Remaining Defendants

Maynard v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al.

2:12-cv-05620

C.R. Bard, Inc., TissueScience Laboratories,Limited, SofradimProduction SAS, BostonScientific Corporation,Analytic BiosurgicalSolutions, MentorCorporation, MentorWorldwide, LLC,Caldera Medical, Inc.,Tyco Healthcare GroupLP, United StatesSurgical Corporation,Covidien, Inc.

Millard v. Boston Scientific Corp.

2:14-cv-28194

Boston ScientificCorp.

Williams v. Boston Scientific Corp.

2:13-cv-4402

Boston ScientificCorp.

Varney v. Boston Scientific Corp.

2:14-cv-20518

Boston ScientificCorp.


Summaries of

In re Bos. Sci. Corp. Pelvic Repair Sys. Prods. Liab. Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 22, 2020
MDL NO. 2326 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 22, 2020)
Case details for

In re Bos. Sci. Corp. Pelvic Repair Sys. Prods. Liab. Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP., PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 22, 2020

Citations

MDL NO. 2326 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 22, 2020)