From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bolson

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 10, 2013
78 A.3d 526 (N.J. 2013)

Summary

finding that, when an attorney who is not certified shares his fee with a referring attorney who is not a partner in or associate of the attorney's firm, he violates RPC 1.5(e)

Summary of this case from In re Brady

Opinion

2013-01-10

In the Matter of David A. BOLSON, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 030241979).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12–148, concluding that DAVID A. BOLSON of SOUTH ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be censured for violating RPC 1.5(e) (improperly sharing fees with lawyers not in the same firm), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID A. BOLSON is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Bolson

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 10, 2013
78 A.3d 526 (N.J. 2013)

finding that, when an attorney who is not certified shares his fee with a referring attorney who is not a partner in or associate of the attorney's firm, he violates RPC 1.5(e)

Summary of this case from In re Brady
Case details for

In re Bolson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of David A. BOLSON, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jan 10, 2013

Citations

78 A.3d 526 (N.J. 2013)
216 N.J. 166

Citing Cases

In re Brady

Rather, the violation of R. 1:39-6(d) is governed by RPC 1.5(e). In re Bolson, 216 N.J. 166 (2013) (finding…