From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re B.O.E., Ramapo Central v. Town of Ramapo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 2003
1 A.D.3d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-10058

Argued October 14, 2003.

November 17, 2003.

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, Resolution No. 2001-529 of the Town Board of the Town of Ramapo void, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), dated September 19, 2002, which granted the separate motions of the Town of Ramapo, Christopher P. St. Lawrence, Edward Friedman, Frances M. Hunter, Harry Reiss, David Stein, and Jo Anne Soules, and the respondent Fountainview at College Road, Inc., to dismiss the petition.

Greenberg, Wanderman Fromson, Nanuet, N.Y. (Stephen M. Fromson of counsel), for appellants.

Michael I. Klein, Town Attorney, Suffern, N.Y. (Janice Gittelman of counsel), for respondents Town of Ramapo, Christopher P. St. Lawrence, Edward Friedman, Frances M. Hunter, Harry Reiss, David Stein, and Jo Anne Soules.

Dorfman, Lynch Lynch, Nyack, N.Y. (Burton K. Dorfman of counsel), for respondent Fountainview at College Road, Inc.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, SONDRA MILLER, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto declaring that Resolution No. 2001-529 of the Town Board of the Town of Ramapo is legal and valid; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The resolution adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Ramapo, which settled certain litigation between the Town of Ramapo and Fountainview at College Road, Inc., was specifically authorized by Town Law § 68(4). Therefore, the Supreme Court correctly declined to declare that the resolution and the stipulation of settlement were invalid ( see Matter of Nassau Shores Civic Assn. v. Colby, 118 A.D.2d 782), and properly granted the motions to dismiss the petition. However, since the petitioners requested a declaratory judgment, the judgment should be modified by adding a declaration that the resolution is legal and valid ( see Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, appeal dismissed 371 U.S. 74, cert denied 371 U.S. 901).

The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.

RITTER, J.P., FLORIO, S. MILLER and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re B.O.E., Ramapo Central v. Town of Ramapo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 2003
1 A.D.3d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re B.O.E., Ramapo Central v. Town of Ramapo

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF BOARD OF EDUCATION OF RAMAPO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 2003

Citations

1 A.D.3d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 277