From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re B.M.S.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Oct 15, 2015
NO. 14-15-00864-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 15, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 14-15-00864-CV

10-15-2015

IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.S., CHILD, Appellant


On Appeal from the 314th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2014-04457J

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 9, 2015. The notice of appeal was due September 29, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on October 9, 2015, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

In re B.M.S.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Oct 15, 2015
NO. 14-15-00864-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 15, 2015)
Case details for

In re B.M.S.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.S., CHILD, Appellant

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 15, 2015

Citations

NO. 14-15-00864-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 15, 2015)