From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Blumenfeld

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 26, 2014
130 A.3d 951 (D.C. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14–BG–1036.

11-26-2014

In re Scott B. BLUMENFELD, Respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law with the right to apply for reinstatement in six months, see Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Blumenfeld, 439 Md. 241, 95 A.3d 628 (2014), this court's September 29, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why the functionally equivalent discipline in the form of a suspension for a period of six months, with his reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness, should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause but filed an affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on November 14, 2014, it is

ORDERED that Scott B. Blumenfeld is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months, nunc pro tunc to November 14, 2014. Reinstatement is contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007).


Summaries of

In re Blumenfeld

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 26, 2014
130 A.3d 951 (D.C. 2014)
Case details for

In re Blumenfeld

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: SCOTT B. BLUMENFELD, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 501870

Court:DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Nov 26, 2014

Citations

130 A.3d 951 (D.C. 2014)

Citing Cases

In re Blumenfeld

PER CURIAM On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel's Report regarding petitioner's petition for…