From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Block

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 20, 2007
742 N.W.2d 442 (Minn. 2007)

Summary

holding that a failure to follow statutory deadlines, even when written in a mandatory fashion, does not divest the court of subject-matter jurisdiction in the civil-commitment context

Summary of this case from In re C. S. N.

Opinion

No. A07-1867.

December 20, 2007.


ORDER

On October 17, 2007, this court suspended respondent Timothy Michael Block from the practice of law for a period of 60 days. Respondent has filed an affidavit stating that he has fully complied with the terms of the suspension order, except for successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, and requests reinstatement. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility does not oppose the request.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Timothy Michael Block is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, subject to his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination within one year of the October 17, 2007, suspension order.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer

Associate Justice


Summaries of

In re Block

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 20, 2007
742 N.W.2d 442 (Minn. 2007)

holding that a failure to follow statutory deadlines, even when written in a mandatory fashion, does not divest the court of subject-matter jurisdiction in the civil-commitment context

Summary of this case from In re C. S. N.
Case details for

In re Block

Case Details

Full title:In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Timothy Michael BLOCK, a…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 20, 2007

Citations

742 N.W.2d 442 (Minn. 2007)

Citing Cases

In re C. S. N.

We acknowledge that not all violations of statute have jurisdictional consequences. See In re Disciplinary…