From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Biolase, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 30, 2015
CASE NO. SACV 13-01300-JLS-(FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. SACV 13-01300-JLS-(FFMx)

10-30-2015

IN RE BIOLASE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION


JUDGMENT

WHEREAS the Court previously granted final approval of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation (see Final Approval Order, Doc. 98; Stip., Doc. 74-7), and WHEREAS due and adequate notice has been given to the Class, and WHEREAS the Court reviewed and considered the Stipulation, all papers filed and proceedings held in connection with the Settlement, and the record in the Litigation, and with good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation, and all terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation, unless otherwise set forth herein.

2. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation and over all parties to the Litigation, including, but not limited to, Lead Plaintiff, all Settlement Class Members, and Defendants.

3. The Settlement has created a fund of $1,750,000 in cash, plus interest or income earned thereon, that is already on deposit. The parties, Lead Counsel, and the Claims Administrator are directed to administer the Stipulation in accordance with its terms and provisions. The Escrow Agent appointed pursuant to the Stipulation shall maintain the Settlement Fund in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Stipulation.

4. This action, including all individual claims and Settlement Class claims presented thereby, is dismissed with prejudice. The Parties are to bear their own fees and costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation.

5. The Releases set forth in the Settlement are incorporated herein by reference and are effective as of the date of this Judgment.

6. The terms of the Stipulation and of this Judgment shall be forever binding on Defendants, Lead Plaintiff, and all other Settlement Class Members (regardless of whether or not any individual Settlement Class Member submits a Proof of Claim or seeks or obtains a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund), as well as their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns.

7. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, the Court hereby retains exclusive jurisdiction over the parties and Members of the Settlement Class for all matters relating to the: (a) implementation of the Settlement and any award or distribution of the Settlement Fund, including interest or income earned thereon; (b) disposition of the Settlement Fund; (c) determination of applications for attorneys' fees, costs, interest and reimbursement of expenses in the Litigation; and (d) construction, interpretation, enforcement, effectuation, and administration of the Stipulation.

8. Plaintiffs' Counsel are hereby awarded 25% of the Gross Settlement Fund after the payment of approved expenses, or $428,749.02, in attorneys' fees and $35,003.92 in reimbursement of expenses, which shall be paid to Plaintiffs' Counsel from the Gross Settlement Fund with interest at the same rate that the Gross Settlement Fund earns. The awarded attorneys' fees and expenses, and interest or income earned thereon, shall be paid to Lead Counsel from the Gross Settlement subject to the terms, conditions, and obligations of the Stipulation, which terms, conditions, and obligations are incorporated herein.

9. The approved Plan of Allocation or award of attorneys' fees and expenses in no way shall disturb or affect this Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal and shall be considered separate from this Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal.

10. Without further approval from the Court, the parties are authorized to agree to and adopt such amendments, modifications and expansions of the Stipulation and its implementing documents, including all exhibits to the Stipulation, as (a) shall be consistent in all material respects with this Judgment, or (b) do not materially limit the rights of Settlement Class Members. Without further order of the Court, the parties may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Stipulation.

11. There being no just reason to delay, the Court hereby directs the Clerk of the Court to enter this Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: October 30, 2015

/s/_________

THE HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Biolase, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 30, 2015
CASE NO. SACV 13-01300-JLS-(FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2015)
Case details for

In re Biolase, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BIOLASE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 30, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. SACV 13-01300-JLS-(FFMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2015)