From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Billups

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 2010
69 A.D.3d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 2008-10749, 2009-03600.

January 26, 2010.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Directors of the Huntington Community First Aid Squad suspending the petitioner for 60 days and permanently removing him as a "crew leader," the petitioner appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), dated September 11, 2008, which, denied the amended petition and dismissed the proceeding, and (2) an order of the same court dated March 6, 2009, which denied the petitioner's motion for leave to renew.

John J. Broderick, Syosset, N.Y. (James J. Cruise, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Glynn, Mercep and Purcell, LLP, Stony Brook, N.Y. (Timothy B. Glynn of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Miller, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment and the order are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

In the amended petition, the petitioner, in effect, admitted that on May 9, 2007, he violated a prior oral directive given to him by First Deputy Chief Orr of the Huntington Community First Aid Squad (hereinafter the squad) on April 18, 2007, temporarily suspending him from acting as a "crew chief." As a consequence of the petitioner's actions on May 9, 2007, the petitioner was charged by letter dated May 18, 2007, inter alia, with insubordination. After a hearing, the respondent made a determination to suspend the petitioner for 60 days and permanently remove him as a "crew chief." The determination had a rational basis, was neither arbitrary nor capricious, and was not affected by an error of law ( see Matter of Scherbyn v Wayne-Finger Lakes Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 77 NY2d 753, 757-758; Matter of Gundrum v Ambach, 55 NY2d 872, 873). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly, denied the amended petition and dismissed the proceeding.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.


Summaries of

In re Billups

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 2010
69 A.D.3d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Billups

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM M. BILLUPS, Appellant, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 26, 2010

Citations

69 A.D.3d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 677
894 N.Y.S.2d 479