In re E.P.

Full title: IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF E.P., Appellant

Court: Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Apr 7, 2020

No. 05-20-00377-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2020)

Opinion

No. 05-20-00377-CV

04-07-2020

IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF E.P., Appellant

ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. MI-20-00463

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant's pro se motion for re-examination of the process and pivotal documents. Because appellant is represented by counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation, we DENY the motion. See Smith v. Smith, 22 S.W.3d 140, 151, 153 (Tex. App.—Houston [14^th Dist.] 2000, no pet.) (civil litigant not entitled to hybrid representation); see also In re Black, 04-18-00700-CV, 2018 WL 6331052, *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 5, 2018, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (same - proceeding for civil commitment of sexually violent predator).

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE