From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IN RE BESS EATON DONUT FLOUR COMPANY, INC.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island
Jul 23, 2004
BK Nos. 04-10630, 04-10682 (Bankr. D.R.I. Jul. 23, 2004)

Opinion

BK Nos. 04-10630, 04-10682.

July 23, 2004


ORDER OVERRULING CREDITORS' OBJECTION TO DEBTORS' REQUEST FOR AN ORDER ALLOWING CLAIMS AND AUTHORIZING DISTRIBUTION TO CREDITORS


Heard on the Debtors' First Application for Allowance of Claims and Distribution to Creditors, and the Limited Objection of unsecured creditors 1800 Smith Street Associates and 1500 Mineral Spring Associates, LP (the Objectors). The Debtors wish to disburse in excess of $12 million plus 6% interest to unsecured and undisputed creditors. The Debtors are also prepared to place $3.3 million in escrow to cover disputed claims, and on top of that they estimate a surplus $5.0 to $8.5 million after paying all claims and expenses in full, plus interest.

The Objectors argue that disbursement should not be made at this time but should be delayed until their claims have been litigated and/or resolved, thereby guaranteeing that they will not be the victims of a shortfall when all is said and done. The Objectors profess concern that the escrow is insufficient and that the projected $5 to $8 million dollar surplus "may not materialize."

As for the plan to escrow $850,000 for disputed claims in the amount of approximately $843,000, the Objectors argue that said amount does not provide a sufficient cushion for litigation expense and interest to which they may be entitled at the end of the day. The Objectors cannot quantify a number, they are hard pressed to show how it would even begin to approach $5.0 million, and their demand, frankly, is overkill.

In light of what I consider to be a good faith and well substantiated projected cash surplus in this case, there is no reason to delay the payment of $12,000,000 to creditors now. To do so would cause the Debtors to incur interest on undisputed claims at 6%, while the Objectors' claims are being litigated. No other disputed creditor has complained about the proposed escrow for their claim or the Debtors' projections, and the proposed distribution is strongly supported by the Creditors' Committee. Because the economics and the equities of the situation weigh so heavily in favor of distribution now, the Limited Objections of 1800 Smith Street Associates and 1500 Mineral Spring Associates, LP are OVERRULED. As additional (but very likely unnecessary) protection for the Objectors and other disputed creditors, all cash surpluses shall be held in escrow by Debtors' counsel until further order.

As part of this distribution, the Debtors propose to pay in excess of $8.5 million to unsecured creditors. If interest were to accrue at 6% on these undisputed claims, that will cost the estate an additional $1,410 per day. Given the parties' mutual vow to pursue this claim litigation to the bitter end, it could take months or years to resolve.

Enter judgment consistent with this order.


Summaries of

IN RE BESS EATON DONUT FLOUR COMPANY, INC.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island
Jul 23, 2004
BK Nos. 04-10630, 04-10682 (Bankr. D.R.I. Jul. 23, 2004)
Case details for

IN RE BESS EATON DONUT FLOUR COMPANY, INC.

Case Details

Full title:In re: BESS EATON DONUT FLOUR COMPANY, INC., Chapter 11, Debtor. In re…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island

Date published: Jul 23, 2004

Citations

BK Nos. 04-10630, 04-10682 (Bankr. D.R.I. Jul. 23, 2004)