From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bernot

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 3, 2012
210 N.J. 117 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-3

In the Matter of Robert J. BERNOT, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 003871982).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–371, concluding that ROBERT J. BERNOT of FLEMINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT J. BERNOT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Bernot

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 3, 2012
210 N.J. 117 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Bernot

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Robert J. BERNOT, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: May 3, 2012

Citations

210 N.J. 117 (N.J. 2012)
41 A.3d 737

Citing Cases

In re Bernot

On May 2, 2012, respondent received a reprimand for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence). In re Bernot, 210…

In re Bernot

On May 2, 2012, respondent received a reprimand for violating RPC 1.4(c) (failure to explain a matter to the…