Opinion
No. 524 C.D. 2014
04-14-2014
In Re: Nomination Petition of Timothy Reilly As Democratic Candidate for Office of Committee Person Appeal of: Carole Bergiven
BEFORE: HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER, Judge HONORABLE ROBERT SIMPSON, Judge HONORABLE P. KEVIN BROBSON, Judge OPINION NOT REPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION BY JUDGE LEADBETTER
In this appeal from the decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County overruling a challenge to the nomination petition of Timothy Reilly, we confront the same issue decided in the related case of In Re: Nomination Petition of Meghan Reilly, (Pa. Cmwlth. No. 523 C.D. 2014), i.e., whether a circulator's affidavit is fatally defective when it inaccurately names the candidate as the circulator but contains the notarized signature of the actual circulator. We conclude that such a defect is not fatal to the nomination and affirm common pleas.
Timothy Reilly timely submitted a nomination petition seeking placement on the primary ballot as a nominee for democratic committee person, a nomination requiring ten signatures. Reilly's petition contains 19 signatures and a circulator's affidavit entitled, "Affidavit of Qualified Elector," on which Reilly's name is inappropriately printed in the blank space intended for the name of the circulator. The actual circulator signed the Affidavit and that signature is notarized.
Carole Bergiven filed a timely challenge to the nomination petition, asserting that the circulator's affidavit is defective and seeking to have the nomination set aside. Following a very brief hearing on March 21, 2014, common pleas, ruling from the bench, granted the petition to set aside. However, on March 24, common pleas reconsidered its ruling and directed that the County Board of Elections accept Reilly's nomination petition and place his name on the ballot. Bergiven sought reconsideration, which common pleas denied, and thereafter, Bergiven filed the present appeal.
As common pleas noted, this case is closely intertwined with that of two related appeals, In Re Nomination Petition of Meghan Reilly, Pa. Cmwlth. No. 523 C.D. 2014, and In Re Nomination Petition of Kerry Fitzpatrick, Pa. Cmwlth. No. 525 C.D. 2014. While not officially consolidated for hearing, all three cases were considered sequentially by common pleas and present the identical issue regarding the defect in the circulator's affidavit. The briefs to this court in all three cases are identical.
In her appeal, Bergiven asserts that common pleas erred as a matter of law in permitting amendment of the circulator's affidavit. According to Bergiven, the affidavit originally submitted with the nomination petition is essentially a nullity that leaves nothing to later be amended. Specifically, she contends that "the circulator's signature was defective because it did not match the signature of the person identified as the circulator in the body of the affidavit" and "the seal and signature of the notary is improper because it is the duty of the notary to assure that the person signing a document is the person named as the signatory." Appellant's brief at 4.
In the statement of issues filed in our court, Bergiven also asserted that common pleas erred in reconsidering ex parte its initial ruling, thus depriving Bergiven of due process. In her brief to our court, Bergiven has abandoned her due process argument and focuses only on the defective circulator affidavit. --------
For the reasons stated in In Re: Nomination Petition of Meghan Reilly, (Pa. Cmwlth. No. 523 C.D. 2014, filed April 14, 2014), we conclude there is no merit in Bergiven's arguments.
Accordingly, we affirm.
/s/_________
BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER,
Judge ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2014, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is hereby AFFIRMED.
/s/_________
BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER,
Judge