From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Beam

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 423 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided February 1st, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Ordinary Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 96 N.J. Eq. 589.

Mr. Eugene Blankenhorn, for the appellant.

Messrs. Griggs Harding, for the respondent.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

In re Beam

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 423 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

In re Beam

Case Details

Full title:In the matter of the appeal of EDWARD BEAM et al., substituted trustees…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 423 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Lommason v. the Washington Trust Co.

The failure to include a statement of changes in investments in an accounting is a valid ground for exception…