From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bayer CropScience, LP

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 14, 2013
504 F. App'x 924 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2012-1444

05-14-2013

IN RE BAYER CROPSCIENCE, LP

HAL K. LITCHFORD, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were SUSAN E. SHAW MCBEE and CHESTER G. MOORE, III, of Washington, DC. KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and LORE A. UNT, Associate Solicitor.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences No. 90/008,317.

JUDGMENT

HAL K. LITCHFORD, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were SUSAN E. SHAW MCBEE and CHESTER G. MOORE, III, of Washington, DC.

KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and LORE A. UNT, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

In re Bayer CropScience, LP

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 14, 2013
504 F. App'x 924 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

In re Bayer CropScience, LP

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BAYER CROPSCIENCE, LP

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 14, 2013

Citations

504 F. App'x 924 (Fed. Cir. 2013)