From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Baycol Products Litigation

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 3, 2007
MDL NO. 1431 (MJD/SRN), Case No. 04-3272 (D. Minn. Aug. 3, 2007)

Opinion

MDL NO. 1431 (MJD/SRN), Case No. 04-3272.

August 3, 2007


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson dated June 1, 2007. Plaintiff has objected to the Report and Recommendation, arguing counsel had a scheduling conflict.

Defendant responds that at no time prior to the scheduled deposition on May 7, 2007 did Plaintiff's counsel contact Defendant to notify of a scheduling conflict. In fact, it appears the first Defendant learned of any conflicts was by letter dated May 8, 2007.

Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Bayer Corporation's Motion for Discovery Sanctions against Plaintiff Marcia Day [Doc. No. 49] is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff Marcia Day's action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

3. Plaintiff's counsel is required to pay the sum of $155.50 to Bayer Corporation within 10 days of the District Court's Order.


Summaries of

In re Baycol Products Litigation

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 3, 2007
MDL NO. 1431 (MJD/SRN), Case No. 04-3272 (D. Minn. Aug. 3, 2007)
Case details for

In re Baycol Products Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re BAYCOL PRODUCTS LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Jeffrey Adams…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 3, 2007

Citations

MDL NO. 1431 (MJD/SRN), Case No. 04-3272 (D. Minn. Aug. 3, 2007)