From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bay Area Dialysis

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Jul 27, 2007
No. 13-07-475-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 27, 2007)

Opinion

No. 13-07-475-CV

Filed: July 27, 2007.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices BENAVIDES and VELA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relators, Bay Area Dialysis Sinton, et al., have filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause asking this Court to direct the Honorable John B. Martinez, presiding judge of the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas to reconsider a ruling regarding the admissibility of an alleged privileged document during an ongoing trial. Relators have also filed a motion for emergency relief. A response has been filed by real party in interest, Billie Durnan.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency relief are hereby DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Bay Area Dialysis

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Jul 27, 2007
No. 13-07-475-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 27, 2007)
Case details for

In re Bay Area Dialysis

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BAY AREA DIALYSIS SINTON, ET AL

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Jul 27, 2007

Citations

No. 13-07-475-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 27, 2007)