From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Phila. Cnty. Twenty-Sixth Additional Investigating Grand Jury

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 17, 2014
100 A.3d 571 (Pa. 2014)

Opinion

No. 93 EM 2014.

09-17-2014

In re PHILADELPHIA COUNTY TWENTY–SIXTH ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATING GRAND JURY, NOTICE C–1. Petition of Richard Basciano, 2100 West Market Street Corp., 2132 West Market Realty Corp., STB Investments Corp., and Richard Sprague, On Behalf of Himself And Sprague & Sprague.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Reply Brief is GRANTED, the Application for Relief Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 722(5) and Pa.R.A.P. 3331(a), or, in the Alternative, an Application for Extraordinary Relief, and for a Stay of Proceedings is DENIED, and the Application to Join the Application is DISMISSED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

In re Phila. Cnty. Twenty-Sixth Additional Investigating Grand Jury

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 17, 2014
100 A.3d 571 (Pa. 2014)
Case details for

In re Phila. Cnty. Twenty-Sixth Additional Investigating Grand Jury

Case Details

Full title:In re PHILADELPHIA COUNTY TWENTY–SIXTH ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATING GRAND…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Sep 17, 2014

Citations

100 A.3d 571 (Pa. 2014)
627 Pa. 355