In re Barton Patent 533, LLC

Full title: IN RE BARTON PATENT 533, LLC

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

485 F. App'x 436 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2012-1116 Re-examination No. 90/010,064

10-15-2012

IN RE BARTON PATENT 533, LLC

KEITH J. GRADY, Polsinelli Shughart PC, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief were GRAHAM L. W. DAY and ROBYN H. AST. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitors.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

KEITH J. GRADY, Polsinelli Shughart PC, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief were GRAHAM L. W. DAY and ROBYN H. AST.

NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitors. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk