to comply with prescribed medication because of a prior history of such noncompliance or because of threats of future noncompliance... Dependence upon factors such as these-clearly evidencing a defendant's threat to himself [or herself] or society-is warranted to justify the significant limitations on an insanity acquitee's liberty interest which accompany secure confinement" (id. at 308; cf. Matter of Eric F., 152 A.D.3d 586, 588-589 [2d Dept 2017]). Furthermore, when reviewing a determination made after a hearing, "this Court's authority is as broad as that of... Supreme Court... Our factual review power permits us to render the determination warranted by the facts, making our own findings of fact when necessary, while bearing in mind that in a close case,... Supreme Court had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses" (Matter of Marvin P., 120 A.D.3d 160, 169-170 [2d Dept 2014], lv dismissed 36 N.Y.3d 1074 [2021]; see generally George L., 85 N.Y.2d at 305; Matter of Barry V., 46 A.D.3d 1392, 1393 [4th Dept 2007]). Applying that well-settled law, we conclude that petitioner met its burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent suffered from a dangerous mental disorder within the meaning of CPL 330.
Furthermore, when reviewing a determination made after a hearing, "this Court's authority is as broad as that of ... Supreme Court ... Our factual review power permits us to render the determination warranted by the facts, making our own findings of fact when necessary, while bearing in mind that in a close case, ... Supreme Court had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses" ( Matter of Marvin P. , 120 A.D.3d 160, 169-170, 986 N.Y.S.2d 190 [2d Dept. 2014], lv dismissed 36 N.Y.3d 1074, 142 N.Y.S.3d 873, 166 N.E.3d 1051 [2021] ; see generallyGeorge L. , 85 N.Y.2d at 305, 624 N.Y.S.2d 99, 648 N.E.2d 475 ; Matter of Barry V. , 46 A.D.3d 1392, 1393, 849 N.Y.S.2d 136 [4th Dept. 2007] ). Applying that well-settled law, we conclude that petitioner met its burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent suffered from a dangerous mental disorder within the meaning of CPL 330.20 (1) (c) (seePeople v. Escobar , 61 N.Y.2d 431, 439-440, 474 N.Y.S.2d 453, 462 N.E.2d 1171 [1984] ).