From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Barr

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District
Oct 20, 2022
No. 11-22-00276-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2022)

Opinion

11-22-00276-CR

10-20-2022

IN RE TODD WILLIAM BARR


Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Relator, Todd William Barr, filed this original petition for writ of mandamus asserting that Tammy Robinson, the District Clerk of Taylor County, Texas, has failed to file his application for writ of habeas corpus with the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code expressly limits our mandamus jurisdiction to (1) writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, (2) writs against a district, county, statutory county, or statutory probate county judge sitting in our appellate district, (3) writs against a district court judge acting as a magistrate court in a court of inquiry within our appellate district, and (4) writs against an associate judge appointed by a district judge within our appellate district pursuant to Chapter 201 of the Texas Family Code. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2022); In re Valley, No. 11-21-00281-CR, 2021 WL 5830675, at *1 (Tex. App.-Eastland Dec. 9, 2021, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Because a district clerk is not included within the limitations set forth in Section 22.221, we must decide whether issuing a mandamus in this instance is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Here, it is not.

Relator seeks relief regarding a postconviction writ of habeas corpus. However, exclusive jurisdiction in postconviction felony proceedings rests with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding). Therefore, we need not issue a writ of mandamus against the district clerk to enforce our jurisdiction. See In re Valley, 2021 WL 5830675, at *1. Further, should Relator find it necessary to complain about the processing of his Article 11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus, he may seek mandamus relief from the Court of Criminal Appeals. Id. (second alteration in original); see also Benson v. Dist. Clerk, 331 S.W.3d 431, 432 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (per curiam).

According to the Court of Criminal Appeals' website, the district clerk filed Relator's application for writ of habeas corpus with that court on October 3, 2022.

We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

In re Barr

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District
Oct 20, 2022
No. 11-22-00276-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2022)
Case details for

In re Barr

Case Details

Full title:IN RE TODD WILLIAM BARR

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District

Date published: Oct 20, 2022

Citations

No. 11-22-00276-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2022)