Opinion
No. 09-03-148 CV.
Opinion Delivered April 10, 2003.
Original Proceeding.
Before McKEITHEN, C.J., BURGESS and GAULTNEY, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.
Mandamus will issue only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or violation of a duty imposed by law when that abuse cannot be remedied by appeal. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992). Relators seek a writ of mandamus to compel the trial judge to enter an order disqualifying the counsel for the real parties in interest. The trial court denied the relators' motions to disqualify after a hearing in which counsel for the real parties in interest demonstrated the precautions implemented by counsel to effectively screen from the relators' cases the newly-hired legal secretary formerly employed by counsel for the relators. See Phoenix Founders, Inc. v. Marshall, 887 S.W.2d 831 (Tex. 1994). After reviewing the petition and record, we conclude that the relators have not shown a clear abuse of discretion or violation of a duty imposed by law.
The petition for writ of mandamus, filed March 26, 2003, is DENIED.