From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bankers Life Casualty Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 12, 1952
199 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1952)

Opinion

No. 14222.

November 6, 1952. Rehearing Denied December 12, 1952.

Charles F. Short, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Miller Walton, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

M.H. Blackshear, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. of Georgia, Lamar Sizemore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.


Upon full consideration of the briefs and arguments on the motion to dismiss, the court is of the opinion that no fact or reason is stated showing that the relief by mandamus is an appropriate remedy. Without, therefore, determining, or considering on the merits, whether the order complained of was rightly entered, the motion to dismiss the petition, because the relief prayed for is not appropriate, is granted, and the petition is dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Bankers Life Casualty Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 12, 1952
199 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1952)
Case details for

In re Bankers Life Casualty Co.

Case Details

Full title:In re BANKERS LIFE CASUALTY CO

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 12, 1952

Citations

199 F.2d 593 (5th Cir. 1952)

Citing Cases

Bankers Life Cas. Co. v. Holland

P. 384. 199 F.2d 593, affirmed. Charles F. Short, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief…

Metro. San. Dist. of Gr. Chicago v. Gen. E.

This Court very recently concluded that it could not bring itself to "`accept the suggestion in Giusti v.…