From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Banc, Am. Inv. Ser

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 23, 2004
No. 02-04-229-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 23, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-04-229-CV

Delivered: July 23, 2004.

Original Proceeding.

Jim Parker, Kuperman, Orr, Rial Albers, P.C., Austin, TX, for relator.

Respondent, pro se.

Earl Rutledge, Law Office of Earl Rutledge, P.C., Hurst, TX, for real party in interest.

Panel A: LIVINGSTON, J., CAYCE, C.J., and WALKER, J. WALKER, J. would request a response and grant temporary relief.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.


The court has considered relators' petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief are denied.

Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

In re Banc, Am. Inv. Ser

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 23, 2004
No. 02-04-229-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 23, 2004)
Case details for

In re Banc, Am. Inv. Ser

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BANC OF AMERICA INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL DEGOLIER, AND…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 23, 2004

Citations

No. 02-04-229-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 23, 2004)

Citing Cases

Baisi v. Lancaster

Banc of Am. Inv. Servs., Inc. v. Lancaster, No. 2-04-223-CV, 2004 WL 1879597 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth Aug. 24,…