From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Baird

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 7, 2008
54 A.D.3d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 504075.

August 7, 2008.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 28, 2007, which ruled that claimant's request for a hearing was untimely.

Laurie G. Baird, Albany, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ.


After quitting her part-time job, claimant was terminated from her full-time job. She applied for unemployment insurance benefits and, on October 17, 2006, the Department of Labor mailed an initial determination denying her claim. The reverse side of the initial determination advised claimant that a request for a hearing had to be made within 30 days of the date it was mailed. Claimant, however, did not request a hearing until April 6, 2007. The Commissioner of Labor objected to the timeliness of the hearing, which was ultimately sustained by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. Pursuant to Labor Law § 620 (1) (a), a claimant has 30 days within which to request a hearing after the date of mailing of the initial determination ( see Matter of Ricketts [Commissioner of Labor], 47 AD3d 1177). In the case at hand, claimant made her request for a hearing well outside the 30-day time period and did not provide a reasonable excuse for her delay ( see Matter of McCarthy [Commissioner of Labor], 39 AD3d 993, 993; Matter of Palumbos [Commissioner of Labor], 32 AD3d 1060). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Baird

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 7, 2008
54 A.D.3d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Baird

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of LAURIE G. BAIRD, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 7, 2008

Citations

54 A.D.3d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6529
862 N.Y.S.2d 415

Citing Cases

In re Wright

Claimant appeals. We affirm. It is undisputed that claimant failed to request a hearing within 30 days of the…

In re Ganisin

We affirm. Pursuant to Labor Law § 620 (1) (a), a dissatisfied claimant has 30 days in which to request a…