From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Bailey

Supreme Court of Vermont
Sep 20, 2021
No. 21-AP-217 (Vt. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

21-AP-217

09-20-2021

In re Denise Bailey, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel*)


In the case title, an asterisk (*) indicates an appellant and a double asterisk (**) indicates a cross-appellant. Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal

Original Jurisdiction

Professional Responsibility Board CASE NO. PRB File No. 2022-031

ENTRY ORDER

In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:

Respondent Denise Bailey is a lawyer licensed to practice law in the State of Vermont. Disciplinary Counsel and respondent jointly filed with the Court a petition for interim suspension due to a medical condition that currently prevents respondent from meeting the needs of her clients. Having reviewed the petition and the accompanying affidavit, the Court concludes that respondent's current medical condition prevents her from practicing law and hereby orders that she be transferred to interim suspension status in accordance with Administrative Order 9, Rule 22. Respondent shall comply with the notice requirements set forth in A.O. 9, Rule 27.

Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice Beth Robinson, Associate Justice Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice Karen R. Carroll, Associate Justice William D. Cohen, Associate Justice


Summaries of

In re Bailey

Supreme Court of Vermont
Sep 20, 2021
No. 21-AP-217 (Vt. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

In re Bailey

Case Details

Full title:In re Denise Bailey, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel*)

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

No. 21-AP-217 (Vt. Sep. 20, 2021)