From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Auz

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Apr 30, 2013
NO. 14-13-00345-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 30, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 14-13-00345-CV

04-30-2013

IN RE FELIX AUZ, Relator


Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied in Part, Dismissed in Part, and Memorandum Opinion filed April 30, 2013.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-37321


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 22, 2013, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. This petition arises from an order signed April 2, 2103, by the Honorable Jeff Shadwick, presiding judge of the 55th District Court of Harris County, disbursing funds in the registry of the court to defendants' counsel. In the petition, relator asks this Court to order Chris Daniel, the Harris County District Clerk, not to release the funds to anyone other than himself and to disburse the funds to relator. Relator further asks this court to compel the Honorable Jeff Shadwick to vacate his order signed April 2, 2013, and to order disbursement of the funds to relator.

This court's mandamus jurisdiction is limited to (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in our district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. Relator's request directed toward the district clerk is not necessary to enforce this court's jurisdiction. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction over relator's request and the petition for writ of mandamus as to the district clerk is ordered dismissed. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(b)(1).

Regarding relator's request to vacate the trial court's order, we hold relator has an adequate remedy by appeal. The funds were place in the registry of the court as part of an agreed temporary injunction. The trial court's order dismissing the case with prejudice was a final judgment but made no award of the funds. We therefore hold that in this case the order releasing the funds is an appealable post-judgment order. See Cook v. Stallcup, 170 S.W.3d 916, 920 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2005, no pet.) (post-judgment orders enforcing the court's judgment itself are appealable orders); Tex. R. Civ. P. 308 (a trial court has authority to enter post judgment orders to enforce its judgment).

Appellant's notice of appeal from the order signed April 2, 2013, is due on or before May 2, 2013. See also Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(2).

Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus as to the presiding judge of the 55th District Court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison and Busby.


Summaries of

In re Auz

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Apr 30, 2013
NO. 14-13-00345-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 30, 2013)
Case details for

In re Auz

Case Details

Full title:IN RE FELIX AUZ, Relator

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 30, 2013

Citations

NO. 14-13-00345-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 30, 2013)