From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Autry

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 2, 2015
116 A.3d 568 (N.J. 2015)

Opinion

D-98, 075678

2015-07-02

In the Matter of Wayne Antonio AUTRY, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 032792000).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14–286, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f) (default by respondent), that WAYNE ANTONIO AUTRY of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21–6 (recordkeeping improprieties), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to comply with a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WAYNE ANTONIO AUTRY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Autry

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 2, 2015
116 A.3d 568 (N.J. 2015)
Case details for

In re Autry

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Wayne Antonio AUTRY, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jul 2, 2015

Citations

116 A.3d 568 (N.J. 2015)
222 N.J. 5

Citing Cases

In re Zuvich

Even in the absence of a negligent misappropriation, a reprimand may be imposed if the attorney failed to…

In re Autry

On July 2, 2015, he was reprimanded in a default matter for recordkeeping violations and for failure to…