In re Auto. Wire Harness Sys. Antitrust Litig.

Full title: In re: AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS SYSTEMS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court: UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Date published: Feb 23, 2012

MDL No. 2311 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 23, 2012)

Opinion

MDL No. 2311

02-23-2012

In re: AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS SYSTEMS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Jeffery N. Lüthi

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -1)

On February 7, 2012, the Panel transferred 1 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been transferred to the Eastern District of Michigan. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Marianne O Battani.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Michigan and assigned to Judge Battani.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the Eastern District of Michigan for the reasons stated in the order of February 7, 2012, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Marianne O Battani.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

___________________________

Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the

original on file in this office.

Clerk, U.S. District Court

Eastern District of Michigan

By. ___________________________

Deputy Clerk

IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS SYSTEMS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

MDL No. 2311

SCHEDULE CTO -1 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ALABAMA SOUTHERN ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ALS ¦1¦11-00696 ¦Sirmon et al v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al 12-10675 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ARKANSAS EASTERN ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Landers Auto Group Number One Inc v. Delphi ¦ ¦ARE ¦4¦11-00757 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Automotive Systems LLC et al 12-10676 ¦ +-------------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦CALIFORNIA NORTHERN¦ ¦ +-------------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦CAN ¦3¦11-05057 ¦Nicoud v. Furukawa Electric Company LTD et al 12-10677 ¦ +----+-+------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦CAN ¦3¦11-05477 ¦Budner et al v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al 12-10678 ¦ +----+-+------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦CAN ¦3¦12-00258 ¦Maravilla et al v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al 12-10679¦ +----+-+------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦CAN ¦4¦11-05301 ¦Kelly et al v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al 2-10680 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦MARTENS CARS OF WASHINGTON INC. v. ¦ ¦DC ¦1¦11-01892 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦FURUKAWA ELECTRIC CO., LTD. et al 12-10681 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦LOUISIANA EASTERN ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦LAE ¦2¦11-03177 ¦Muscara v. Delphi Automotive, LLP et al 12-10682 ¦ +----+-+------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦LAE ¦2¦12-00003 ¦Brock et al v. Delphi Automotive, LLP et al 12-10683 ¦ +----+-+------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦LAE ¦2¦12-00048 ¦Keifer v. Delphi Automotive, LLP et al 2-10684 ¦ +----+-+------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦LAE ¦2¦12-00062 ¦Byrne et al v. Delphi Automotive, LLP et al 2-10685 ¦ +----+-+------------+-------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦LAE ¦2¦12-00171 ¦Josefsberg v. Delphi Automotive, LLP et al 2-10686 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦MINNESOTA ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Superstore Automotive, Inc. v. Delphi Automotive, ¦ ¦MN ¦0¦11-03092 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦LLP et al 12-10687 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦MSS ¦3¦11-00647 ¦12-10688 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+---------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Hammett Motor Company, Inc. v. Delphi Automotive¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦LLP et al ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦PUERTO RICO ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦PR ¦3¦11-02176¦Crespo v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al 12-10689 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦WEST VIRGINIA SOUTHERN ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦WVS¦5¦12-00079¦Nickell v. Delphi Automotive LLP 12-10690 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------+