From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Auto. Wire Harness Sys. Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Apr 11, 2012
MDL No. 2311 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 11, 2012)

Opinion

MDL No. 2311

04-11-2012

In re: AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS SYSTEMS ANTITRUST LITIGATION


(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)


CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-4)

On February 7, 2012, the Panel transferred 1 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 18 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Eastern District of Michigan. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Marianne O Battani.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Michigan and assigned to Judge Battani.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the Eastern District of Michigan for the reasons stated in the order of February 7, 2012, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Marianne O Battani.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

OR THE PANEL:

______________________

Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in this office.

Clerk, U.S. District Cou

Eastern District of Mich

By _________________

Deputy Clerk

SCHEDULE CTO-4 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

+-------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦DIST ¦DIV. ¦C.A.NO. ¦CASE CAPTION ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦CALIFORNIA NORTHERN ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------¦ ¦CAN ¦3 ¦12-01511 ¦Lamson v. Delphi Automotive LLP et al¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------+


Summaries of

In re Auto. Wire Harness Sys. Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Apr 11, 2012
MDL No. 2311 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 11, 2012)
Case details for

In re Auto. Wire Harness Sys. Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re: AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS SYSTEMS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court:UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Date published: Apr 11, 2012

Citations

MDL No. 2311 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 11, 2012)